Logo-ajdr
Submitted: 14 Aug 2022
Accepted: 26 Dec 2023
ePublished: 29 Mar 2024
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)

Avicenna J Dent Res. 2024;16(1): 22-27.
doi: 10.34172/ajdr.1771
  Abstract View: 30
  PDF Download: 20

Original Article

Attractiveness of Modified Photographs of Class II, Division I Patients as Judged by Laypeople and Orthodontists

Hanieh Jalili Khradmand 1 ORCID logo, Maryam Salehzadeh 2 ORCID logo, Vahid Mollabashi 3, Homa Farhadifard 3* ORCID logo, Maryam Farhadian 4

1 Private Practice
2 Department of Orthodontics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
3 Department of Orthodontics, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
4 Department of Epidemiology, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Homa Farhadifard, Email: homa.far1989@gmail.com

Abstract

Background: There are two treatment alternatives that are commonly proposed to class II, division I patients, including camouflage and orthognathic surgeries.

Methods: The original profile photos of two male and two female patients were altered with Photoshop in order to simulate camouflage and surgical treatment. This was performed by increasing the nasolabial angle by 4 mm, 8 mm, and 12 mm and extending the chin-neck length by 3 mm, 6 mm, and 9 mm. The initial and actual final photos of the patient, along with the six modified pictures, were presented to the participants. They reordered the pictures from the most aesthetic to the least aesthetic.

Results: Overall, 30 orthodontists and 140 laypeople completed the task. Orthodontists perceived surgical treatment as more attractive compared to laypeople. The highest rank was assigned to post-treatment photographs of the patients, while the lowest rank was given to pre-treatment photographs.

Conclusion: Class II treatment adds to profile attractiveness as judged by laypeople and orthodontists. There are some differences in opinions between these groups.


Please cite this article as follows: Jalili Khradmand H, Salehzadeh M, Mollabashi V, Farhadifard H, Farhadian M. Attractiveness of modified photographs of class II, division I patients as judged by laypeople and orthodontists. Avicenna J Dent Res. 2024; 16(1):22-27. doi:10.34172/ajdr.1771
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 31

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 20

Your browser does not support the canvas element.