Logo-ajdr
Submitted: 12 Nov 2020
Accepted: 12 Jan 2021
ePublished: 30 Mar 2021
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)

Avicenna J Dent Res. 2021;13(1): 6-12.
doi: 10.34172/ajdr.2021.02
  Abstract View: 349
  PDF Download: 348

Original Article

Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Class II Cavity in Primary Molars Restored With Glass Ionomer Cement, Zirconomer, and Cention N Using Stereomicroscope: An In Vitro Study

Harshali P Patil 1, Jasmin J Winnier 2*

1 Postgraduate Student, Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, D.Y Patil University, School of Dentistry, Nerul, Navi Mumbai, India.
2 MDS, Associate Professor, Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, D.Y Patil University, School of Dentistry, Nerul, Navi Mumbai, India.
*Correspondence to Jasmin J Winnier, Tel: +9773284371, Email: jasmin.winnier@ dypatil.edu

Abstract

Background: Microleakage is defined as the passage of bacteria, fluid, molecules or ions between the cavity walls and restorative material. There are limited studies in the literature that have compared the microleakage of the newer restorative materials. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare and evaluate microleakage in Class II cavity in primary molars restored with glass ionomer cement, zirconomer and cention N using stereomicroscope.

Method: Standardized Class II cavities were prepared on the extracted primary molars All the prepared samples were divided into 3 experimental groups and were restored as follows: Group I- GIC (GC Universal Restorative); Group II- Zirconomer (SHOFU Inc., Kyoto, Japan) and Group III- Cention-N (Ivoclar Vivadent). The restored teeth were thermocycled, immersed in methylene blue dye and sectioned along the mesiodistal direction. The dye penetration at the occlusal surface and cervical surface was evaluated and compared using a stereo-microscope. Data was analysed using Krushal-Wallis test (Non-parametric ANOVA).

Results: Among the three restorative materials, Cention N as compared to GIC and Zirconomer showed least microleakage at both the occlusal surface and cervical surface.

Conclusion: Cention N a newer restorative material displayed lesser microleakage as compared to GIC and Zirconomer.

Keywords: Class II restorations, primary molars, Cention N, Zirconomer, GIC, Microleakage
Citation: Patil H, Winnier J. Comparative evaluation of microleakage in class II cavity in primary molars restored with glass ionomer cement, zirconomer, and cention n using stereomicroscope: an in vitro study. Avicenna J Dent Res. 2021;13(1):6- 12. doi: 10.34172/ajdr.2021.02.
First Name
 
Last Name
 
Email Address
 
Comments
 
Security code


Abstract View: 349

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 348

Your browser does not support the canvas element.