Logo-ajdr
Submitted: 18 Nov 2021
Revised: 02 Feb 2022
Accepted: 07 Feb 2022
First published online: 13 Dec 2022
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - FireFox Plugin)

Abstract View: 849
PDF Download: 646
Full Text View: 11
Avicenna J Dent Res. 14(4):154-159. doi: 10.34172/ajdr.2022.546

Original Article

Effect of Liquorice-Extract-Containing Antimicrobial Mouthwash on Helicobacter Pylori: An In Vitro Study

Sepideh Bohlouli 1 ORCID logo, Mahdiyeh Esmaeilzadeh 2 ORCID logo, Hossein Samadi Kafil 3, Ramin Negahdari 4, Behnaz Shokouhi 4, Zahra Aghazadeh 1, * ORCID logo

Author information:
1Department of Oral Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
2Dental and Periodontal Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
3Drug Applied Research Center, Department of Microbiology, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
4Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

*Corresponding author: Zahra Aghazadeh, Email: maghazadehbio@gmail.com

Abstract

Background: The oral route is one of the main portals for Helicobacter pylori transmission. The elimination of this bacterial species from the oral cavity might be useful in oral health and decreasing infections due to H. pylori. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a liquorice-extract-containing mouthwash at different concentrations on the proliferation of H. pylori in vitro.

Methods: H. pylori bacterial species was cultured, and the isolated strains from the specific culture medium were prepared for the welling procedures. The liquorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra) mouthwash at 12.5% and 25% concentrations was added to the case group wells at 1,1/2,1/4,1/8, and 1/16 dilutions. In the control group, regular daily mouthwash containing cetylpyridinium chloride and sodium fluoride components was used. The growth inhibition zones were analyzed in the study groups. The data were analyzed by SPSS and reported using descriptive statistics (means±standard deviation).

Results: In both the mouthwashes containing 25% and 12.5% concentration, the means of growth inhibition zones at 1, 1/2, 1/4, 1/8, and 1/16 dilutions were larger than those in the control group. Further, the largest growth inhibition zone was seen with the undiluted 25% mouthwash. There were no significant differences in the H. pylori growth inhibition zones between 25% and 12.5% mouthwashes (P=0.14).

Conclusions: Mouthwashes containing liquorice extracts inhibited the growth of H. pylori more significantly than mouthwash with no liquorice extract. Therefore, it is suggested that liquorice extract-containing mouthwashes be used to prevent H. pylori infections in the oral cavity in clinical studies.

Keywords: Helicobacter pylori, Plant extract, Mouthwash

Copyright and License Information

© 2022 The Author(s); Published by Hamadan University of Medical Sciences.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited.

Please cite this article as follows: Bohlouli S, Esmaeilzadeh M, Samadi Kafil H, Negahdari R, Shokouhi B, Aghazadeh Z. Effect of liquorice-extract-containing antimicrobial mouthwash on Helicobacter pylori: an in vitro study. Avicenna J Dent Res. 2022; 14(4):154-159. doi:10.34172/ajdr.2022.546


Introduction

Helicobacter pylori is a bacterial species from the Helicobacteraceaefamily and the most common microorganism to affect humans all over the world. More than half of the world’s population is contaminated with this microorganism, and more than 81% of the infected individuals are asymptomatic. It might also have a role in the normal ecology of the stomach (1-4). H. pylori was identified by two Australian scientists, Barry Marshal and Rabin Warren, in 1982, who discovered this bacterial species in patients with chronic gastritis and peptic ulcers. They received the Nobel Prize in 2005 in the field of pharmaceutics for discovering H. pylori and its role in peptic ulcers (5).

Helicobacter pylori is a microaerophilic gram-negative microorganism, generally found in the stomach. Its role has been reported in peptic ulcers, chronic gastritis, and malignancies such as adenocarcinoma and lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue cells as an important etiologic agent (6-9). Some studies have investigated H. pylori in coronary artery disorders, atherosclerosis, gallstones, malabsorption, metabolic syndrome, type I diabetes, and insulin resistance (10-12).

The co-occurrence of H. pylori has been reported in oral cancer lesions, dental plaque, recurrent aphthous stomatitis, and dental caries (13-15). A relationship has been also reported between H. pylori counts and the severity of periodontitis in patients with periodontitis. Moreover, there is a relationship between the periodontal health status of the elderly with periodontitis and H. pylori contamination of the stomach (16). In addition, H. pylori DNA was extracted from some pathologic lesions of the oral cavity, including leukoplakia and oral lichen planus. However, this microorganism has not been detected in normal and healthy mucosa (17).

Helicobacter pylori contamination of the stomach was treated with systemic antibiotics such as metronidazole, tetracycline, bismuth, and omeprazole (18). Such treatment not only led to resistance to antibiotics (19) but also was ineffective in some patients, and resistant bacterial infection and recurrence were observed in some patients. Some researchers have suggested that transmission through the oral cavity might be the primary portal of entry for H. pylori, with the dental plaque and saliva serving as a reservoir for H. pylori, inoculating the infectious agent into the stomach after its elimination from the stomach (20). Since indiscriminate use of antibiotics results in resistance to antibiotics, such treatments for H. pylori complicate the treatment process for this microorganism (21).

In recent years, attention has been shifted to the production of new drugs, especially those with a natural origin with antimicrobial effects on this microorganism with fewer side effects. On the other hand, there has been an increase in the tendency of patients to use herbal-derived antibiotics instead of chemical agents in recent decades (22).

Liquorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra) is an herbal medicine with some components that have therapeutic properties. It consists of valuable ingredients that have turned it into a significant agent for the synthesis of useful medications. In vitro studies have shown that the extract of liquorice root inhibits the growth and proliferation of H. pylori and prevents its adhesion to the human gastric mucosa (23,24). In clinical studies on patients with peptic ulcers due to H. pylori, the use of liquorice extract tablets has resulted in the elimination of H. pylori contamination, with a healing effect of this extract on ulcers (25).

Since the oral cavity is one of the principal routes for the transmission of H. pylori, and the dental plaque and saliva can serve as a reservoir and a factor for the proliferation of this infectious agent, its inhibition in the oral cavity can be useful for the oral health and more effective treatment of medical conditions due to this infectious agent. The present in vitro study aimed to evaluate the antibacterial effect of a mouthwash containing liquorice extract on H. pylori’s growth and proliferation. Similar studies were conducted on the effect of liquorice on these bacteria, but this is the first time that this material is evaluated in the mouthwash form.


Materials and Methods

The liquorice extract-containing mouthwash used in the present study was prepared by the Rojin Cosmetic Co. The standard strain of H. pylori (ATCC 43 504) was procured from the Pasteur Institute, Tehran, Iran, to culture on Columbia solid agar plates. To prepare the agar culture plates, 4 grams of the powder of Columbia base agar was dissolved in 100 mL of deionized sterile distilled water and boiled to achieve a transparent solution from the culture medium, which was autoclaved for 15 minutes at 121ºC at 15 pounds pressure. After sterilization, it was cooled up to 45–50ºC. Then, 5 mL of sheep-defibrinated blood (at a 5% ratio) was added to the culture medium, and the culture medium was then placed on plates and stored at 4ºC.

Microbial Culture

After preparing and activating standard lyophilized bacteria, they were suspended in the culture medium, and 6 mL of distilled water was added to it for activation, followed by homogeneous culturing on the culture medium on all the plate surfaces. The inoculated plates were incubated under a microaerophilic condition, an anaerobic jar system, and a special gas pack for 72 hours at 37ºC under an anaerobic condition so that the bacteria can grow, proliferate, and form colonies. Then, urease, catalase, and gram staining tests were used to confirm bacterial growth.

Sampling

McFarland 0.5 Standard

The bacterial counts used for a test should be compared with a standard because if an adequate number of bacteria is not used, false negative results (in terms of sensitivity) may be achieved. Therefore, the 0.5 McFarland standard was used in the present study. First, concentrated sulfuric acid was used to prepare a 1% concentration of sulfuric acid. To this end, 99 mL of distilled water was mixed with 1 mL of concentrated sulfuric acid. Great care was exercised during the procedure due to the exothermic nature of the reaction because the acid should be added to water. Then, 1.175 grams of barium chloride powder was added to 100 mL of distilled water to achieve a 1.175% concentration of barium chloride. Then, 99 mL of 1% sulfuric acid was mixed with 1 mL of barium chloride. Turbidity was seen in the tube due to the precipitation of barium sulfate, which is the 0.5 McFarland standard. Finally, the resulting microbial suspension contained 1.5 × 108 CFU/mL.

Determination of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration

First, some wells were produced in the blood agar culture plates. A colony of freshly cultured bacteria was homogeneously spread, and different dilutions of pure extract of liquorice were prepared at 1/2, 1/4, 1/8, and 1/16 concentrations by adding distilled water. Then, 40 µL of the different concentrations was placed in each well and incubated for 72 hours. The same procedure was repeated for the pure and undiluted liquorice extract (100%) at different volumes of 40, 60, and 90 µL, and the diameter of the growth inhibition zone for each well was measured. Based on the results, 1/4 and 1/8 dilutions were the minimum concentrations of the extract that exhibited a favorable growth inhibition zone. Accordingly, a request was sent to the Rojin Company to prepare 25% and 12.5% concentrations of liquorice extract.

Evaluation of Antimicrobial Effects Using the Plate Well Technique

In the present study, the plate well technique was used to evaluate the antimicrobial effect of two types of mouthwashs (1 and 2) containing liquorice extract at two concentrations of 25% and 12.5%. The plates containing the culture medium were concentrated with the standard samples of the tested bacterial species. Then, a Pasteur pipette was used to create four wells with 5 mm in diameter in each plate, and 40 µL of the pure liquorice-containing mouthwash at 1/2,1/4,1/8, and 1/16 dilutions (6.25,12.5, 25, 50, and 100 vol%) were separately added to each well. All procedures were repeated for the control mouthwash (with a brand name for daily use), which contained cetylpyridinium chloride and sodium fluoride. These procedures were repeated for different volumes of undiluted mouthwashes 1 and 2 at volumes of 90, 60, and 40 µL. Therefore, the bacteria were exposed to all five concentrations of liquorice-containing mouthwashes 1 and 2 and the mouthwash without liquorice extract. The plates were incubated for 72 hours at 37ºC, along with an anaerobic gas pack. Then, the diameters of growth inhibition zones were measured around the wells in the three groups (control and mouthwashes 1 and 2). This procedure was repeated three times in each group for greater validity of the test.

Statistical Analysis

The study data were reported using descriptive statistics (mean ± standard deviation). The means of three measurements of the growth inhibition zones created by different dilutions of mouthwashes 1 and 2 in each well were compared with those created by the control mouthwash. In addition, the means of the growth inhibition zones created by the different volumes of mouthwashes 1 and 2 were compared.


Results

In the present study, first, the MIC of the liquorice extract was determined. Table 1 presents the effects of different volumes of pure liquorice extract on the growth inhibition zone diameters of H. pylori. In the next stage, different dilutions of liquorice extract were prepared with distilled water to determine MIC. Table 2 presents the effects of different liquorice extract concentrations with a 0.4-mL volume and the bacterial growth inhibition zone diameters. Since the control mouthwash (without the extract) had a minor effect on the bacterial growth inhibition zone, these effects were considered baseline or zone effects. Further, since the 1/16 dilution did not have a favorable effect, and the effects of 1/4 and 1/8 dilutions were almost similar, both dilutions were used for comparisons.


Table 1. The Effects of Different Volumes of Pure Liquorice Extract and the Diameters of Bacterial Growth Inhibition Zones
The First Measurement
The volume of pure liquorice extract (µL) 40 60 90 Control
The diameter of inhibition zone (mm) 10 11.5 14 0
The Second Measurement
The volume of pure liquorice extract (µL) 40 60 90 Control
The diameter of inhibition zone (mm) 10 11.5 14.5 0
The Third Measurement
The volume of pure liquorice extract (µL) 40 60 90 Control
The diameter of inhibition zone (mm) 11 12 14 0

Table 2. The Effects of Different Dilutions of Liquorice Extract and the Diameters of Bacterial Growth Inhibition Zones
The First Measurement
The dilution of liquorice extract 1/2 1/4 1/8 1/16 Control
The diameter of inhibition zone (mm) 10 9 8 7 0
The Second Measurement
The dilution of liquorice extract 1/2 1/4 1/8 1/16 Control
The diameter of inhibition zone (mm) 9 9.5 8.5 7 0
The Third Measurement
The dilution of liquorice extract 1/2 1/4 1/8 1/16 Control
The diameter of inhibition zone (mm) 10.5 9 8 7 0

Table 3 presents the inhibition zone diameters under the effect of 25% and 12.5% liquorice extract at different dilutions. Table 4 presents the growth inhibition zones of H. pylori induced by 25% and 12.5% liquorice extract-containing mouthwashes at different dilutions with a volume of 40 µL. A comparison of the two types of mouthwash samples containing 25% and 12.5% concentrations of liquorice extract did not indicate any significant difference (P = 0.41). The results showed that both mouthwash samples containing liquorice extract had larger growth inhibition zones compared to the control group, and the difference was significant (P < 0.05).


Table 3. The Effects of Different Volumes of the Two Mouthwashes Containing 25% and 12.5% Concentrates of Liquorice Extract and the Diameter of Growth Inhibition Zones (in mm)
The First Measurement
Volume (µL) 40 60 90 Control
The diameter of inhibition zone (25%) 13 14 15 0
The diameter of inhibition zone (12.5%) 12 13 14 0
The Second Measurement
Volume (µL) 40 60 90 Control
The diameter of inhibition zone (25%) 12.5 14.5 14 0
The diameter of inhibition zone (12.5%) 10.5 12 14 0
The Third Measurement
Volume (µL) 40 60 90 Control
The diameter of inhibition zone (25%) 12.5 14.5 14.5 0
The diameter of inhibition zone (12.5%) 12 13 13.5 0

Table 4. The Effect of Different Dilutions of the Two Mouthwashes Containing 25% and 12.5% Concentrations of Liquorice Extract With a Volume of 40 µL and the Diameters of Growth Inhibition Zones (in mm)
The First Measurement
Dilution 1/16 1/8 1/4 1/2 Undiluted Control
The diameter of inhibition zone (25%) 7 8 10 13 14 0
The diameter of inhibition zone (12.5%) 7 7 8.5 10 12.5 0
The Second Measurement
Dilution 1/16 1/8 1/4 1/2 Undiluted Control
The diameter of inhibition zone (25%) 7 7 10 11 14 0
The diameter of inhibition zone (12.5%) 6.5 7 8 11 13 0
The Third Measurement
Dilution 1/16 1/8 1/4 1/2 Undiluted Control
The diameter of inhibition zone (25%) 7 8 10.5 12.5 13 0
The diameter of inhibition zone (12.5%) 6.5 9 8 10.5 13 0

Discussion

The present study evaluated the effects of two daily types of mouthwashes containing liquorice extract at 25% and 12.5% concentrations and the effect of a daily mouthwash containing cetylpyridinium chloride and sodium fluoride without liquorice extract on the growth inhibition of H. pylori in vitro. The results of the present study showed that, compared with the control group mouthwash, both types of mouthwashes containing liquorice extract at the two concentrations mentioned above were more effective in inhibiting H. pylori’s growth and proliferation. The maximum diameter of the growth inhibition zone in the brucella agar culture medium in this study was 15 mm with 90 µL of the 25% liquorice extract-containing mouthwash. Considering the results of a study by Chaves et al, the diameter of this growth inhibition zone is in the range of sensitivity to antibiotics (26). A study by Taghipour et al showed that the diameter of the growth inhibition zone produced by liquorice at a concentration of 33 g/dL was almost similar to that produced by metronidazole against H. pylori, confirming that the components in liquorice can have a role as an effective antibiotic against H. pylori (27).

Several mechanisms have been reported on the mechanism of the effect of liquorice ingredients on the activity of H. pylori. The anti-H. pylori activity of liquorice is attributed to the ingredients found in the extract of its root, referred to as GutGard, which inhibits DNA gyrase, protein synthesis, and dihydrofolate reductase. DNA gyrase is an essential bacterial enzyme that catalyzes the ATP-dependent negative supercoil in the double-stranded circular DNA. It is also necessary for the transcription of bacteria (23,28-30).

A study by Wittschier et al revealed that the glycyrrhizin ingredients in liquorice extract significantly affect the adhesion of H. pylori to the human gastric tissue (24). A comparison of the effects of mouthwashes containing liquorice extract with chlorhexidine mouthwash on Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacilli indicated a higher bacterial inhibitory effect of the liquorice extract-containing mouthwash (31). Moreover, a clinical study by Hajiaghamohammadi et al on patients with dyspnea and peptic ulcer evaluated the effect of liquorice extract on the elimination of H. pylori using the urease test in six weeks. The results indicated a higher rate of H. pylori elimination in peptic ulcer patients receiving liquorice extract (32). Further, in a clinical trial by Momeni et al, patients with H. pylori were assigned to two groups. Liquorice extract was used in one group in addition to their conventional treatment modality for H. pylori. After four weeks, in the group treated with liquorice, H. pylori counts in the urease test and stool analysis were significantly lower than those in the control group (33). Likewise, a study by Park et al showed that special licorice compounds derived from liquorice decreased the expression of genes related to vascular endothelial growth factor, inducible nitric oxide synthase, cyclooxygenase-2, and interleukin 8 in rats contaminated with H. pylori due to their anti-oxidative and anti-inflammatory properties, decreasing the incidence of gastritis and gastric masses in the rats (34).

The different ingredients in liquorice extract might interfere with the different stages of the growth and proliferation of H. pylori. The use of the active ingredient of this plant might eliminate the oral reservoir of H. pylori and prevent the recurrence of gastrointestinal contamination due to the transmission of this bacterial species from the oral cavity to the stomach.


Conclusions

Mouthwashes containing 25% and 12.5% concentrations of liquorice extract led to a higher mean of bacterial growth inhibition zone for H. pylori compared to the mouthwash without this extract.


Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Research Vice-Chancellor of Tabriz University of Medi­cal Sciences.


Author Contributions

The study was planned by SB and ZA. The statistical analyses and interpretation of data were carried out by BS and RN. ME and HSK contributed to the literature review. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.


Conflict of Interest Disclosures

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.


Ethical Statement

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Research Council of Tabriz Dental School, Tabriz, Iran (approval number: IR.TBZMED.VCR.REC.1397.408). All the procedures of the study were performed based on the Declaration of Helsinki.


Funding

The study was supported by the Research Vice-Chancellor of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences.


References

  1. Eun CS, Kim BK, Han DS, Kim SY, Kim KM, Choi BY. Differences in gastric mucosal microbiota profiling in patients with chronic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, and gastric cancer using pyrosequencing methods. Helicobacter 2014; 19(6):407-16. doi: 10.1111/hel.12145 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  2. Oyedeji KS, Smith SI, Arigbabu AO, Coker AO, Ndububa DA, Agbakwuru EA. Use of direct Gram stain of stomach biopsy as a rapid screening method for detection of Helicobacter pylori from peptic ulcer and gastritis patients. J Basic Microbiol 2002; 42(2):121-5. doi: 10.1002/1521-4028(200205)42:2<121::aid-jobm121>3.0.co;2-# [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  3. Logan RP, Walker MM. ABC of the upper gastrointestinal tract: epidemiology and diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. BMJ 2001; 323(7318):920-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7318.920 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  4. Blaser MJ. Who are we? Indigenous microbes and the ecology of human diseases. EMBO Rep 2006; 7(10):956-60. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400812 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  5. Konturek JW. Discovery by Jaworski of Helicobacter pylori and its pathogenetic role in peptic ulcer, gastritis and gastric cancer. J Physiol Pharmacol 2003; 54 Suppl 3:23-41. [ Google Scholar]
  6. Longo-Mbenza B, Nsenga JN, Mokondjimobe E, Gombet T, Assori IN, Ibara JR. Helicobacter pylori infection is identified as a cardiovascular risk factor in Central Africans. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2012; 6:455-61. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.s28680 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  7. Franceschi F, Leo D, Fini L, Santoliquido A, Flore R, Tondi P. Helicobacter pylori infection and ischaemic heart disease: an overview of the general literature. Dig Liver Dis 2005; 37(5):301-8. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2004.10.015 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  8. Wang X, He Q, Jin D, Ma B, Yao K, Zou X. Association between Helicobacter pylori infection and subclinical atherosclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100(46):e27840. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000027840 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  9. Pellicano R, Parravicini PP, Bigi R, Gandolfo N, Aruta E, Gai V. Infection by Helicoibacter pylori and acute myocardial, infarction. Ido cytotoxic strains make a difference? Microbiologica 2002; 25:315-21. [ Google Scholar]
  10. Pilotto A, Rumor F, Franceschi M, Leandro G, Novello R, Soffiati G. Lack of association between Helicobacter pylori infection and extracardiac atherosclerosis in dyspeptic elderly subjects. Age Ageing 1999; 28(4):367-71. doi: 10.1093/ageing/28.4.367 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  11. Whincup P, Danesh J, Walker M, Lennon L, Thomson A, Appleby P. Prospective study of potentially virulent strains of Helicobacter pylori and coronary heart disease in middle-aged men. Circulation 2000; 101(14):1647-52. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.101.14.1647 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  12. Pasceri V, Cammarota G, Patti G, Cuoco L, Gasbarrini A, Grillo RL. Association of virulent Helicobacter pylori strains with ischemic heart disease. Circulation 1998; 97(17):1675-9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.97.17.1675 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  13. Gomes CC, Gomez RS, Zina LG, Amaral FR. Recurrent aphthous stomatitis and Helicobacter pylori. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2016; 21(2):e187-91. doi: 10.4317/medoral.20872 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  14. Mansour-Ghanaei F, Asmar M, Bagherzadeh AH, Ekbataninezhad S. Helicobacter pylori infection in oral lesions of patients with recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Med Sci Monit 2005; 11(12):CR576-9. [ Google Scholar]
  15. Liu Y, Lin H, Bai Y, Qin X, Zheng X, Sun Y. Study on the relationship between Helicobacter pylori in the dental plaque and the occurrence of dental caries or oral hygiene index. Helicobacter 2008; 13(4):256-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-5378.2008.00602.x [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  16. Zheng P, Zhou W. Relation between periodontitis and Helicobacter pylori infection. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015; 8(9):16741-4. [ Google Scholar]
  17. Kazanowska-Dygdała M, Duś I, Radwan-Oczko M. The presence of Helicobacter pylori in oral cavities of patients with leukoplakia and oral lichen planus. J Appl Oral Sci 2016; 24(1):18-23. doi: 10.1590/1678-775720150203 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  18. Katelaris PH, Forbes GM, Talley NJ, Crotty B. A randomized comparison of quadruple and triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori eradication: the QUADRATE study. Gastroenterology 2002; 123(6):1763-9. doi: 10.1053/gast.2002.37051 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  19. Meyer JM, Silliman NP, Wang W, Siepman NY, Sugg JE, Morris D. Risk factors for Helicobacter pylori resistance in the United States: the surveillance of H pylori antimicrobial resistance partnership (SHARP) study, 1993-1999. Ann Intern Med 2002; 136(1):13-24. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-1-200201010-00008 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  20. Silva DG, Tinoco EM, Rocha GA, Rocha AM, Guerra JB, Saraiva IE. Helicobacter pylori transiently in the mouth may participate in the transmission of infection. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2010; 105(5):657-60. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02762010000500009 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  21. Debnath S, Dey D, Hazra S, Ghosh S, Ray R, Hazra B. Antibacterial and antifungal activity of Terminalia arjuna Wight & Arn bark against multi-drug resistant clinical isolates. J Coast Life Med 2013; 1(4):312-8. doi: 10.12980/jclm.1.2013c757 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  22. Li FS, Weng JK. Demystifying traditional herbal medicine with modern approach. Nat Plants 2017; 3:17109. doi: 10.1038/nplants.2017.109 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  23. Asha MK, Debraj D, Prashanth D, Edwin JR, Srikanth HS, Muruganantham N. In vitro anti-Helicobacter pylori activity of a flavonoid rich extract of Glycyrrhiza glabra and its probable mechanisms of action. J Ethnopharmacol 2013; 145(2):581-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2012.11.033 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  24. Wittschier N, Faller G, Hensel A. Aqueous extracts and polysaccharides from liquorice roots (Glycyrrhiza glabra L) inhibit adhesion of Helicobacter pylori to human gastric mucosa. J Ethnopharmacol 2009; 125(2):218-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2009.07.009 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  25. Rahnama M, Mehrabani D, Japoni S, Edjtehadi M, Saberi Firoozi M. The healing effect of licorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra) on Helicobacter pylori infected peptic ulcers. J Res Med Sci 2013; 18(6):532-3. [ Google Scholar]
  26. Perna F, Gatta L, Figura N, Ricci C, Tampieri A, Holton J. Susceptibility of Helicobacter pylori to metronidazole. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98(10):2157-61. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9270(03)00666-x [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  27. Taghipour Zahir S, Zandi H, Botorabi Z, Merat N. Invitro comparitive study of the efficacy of licorice decoctant and choice antibiotics on Helicobacter pylori growth. J Shahid Sadoughi Univ Med Sci 2005;13(3):45-52. [Persian].
  28. Fukai T, Marumo A, Kaitou K, Kanda T, Terada S, Nomura T. Anti-Helicobacter pylori flavonoids from licorice extract. Life Sci 2002; 71(12):1449-63. doi: 10.1016/s0024-3205(02)01864-7 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  29. Chatterji M, Unniraman S, Mahadevan S, Nagaraja V. Effect of different classes of inhibitors on DNA gyrase from Mycobacterium smegmatis. J Antimicrob Chemother 2001; 48(4):479-85. doi: 10.1093/jac/48.4.479 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  30. Miller EF, Vaish S, Maier RJ. Efficiency of purine utilization by Helicobacter pylori: roles for adenosine deaminase and a NupC homolog. PLoS One 2012; 7(6):e38727. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038727 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  31. Ajagannanavar SL, Battur H, Shamarao S, Sivakumar V, Patil PU, Shanavas P. Effect of aqueous and alcoholic licorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra) root extract against Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus in comparison to chlorhexidine: an in vitro study. J Int Oral Health 2014; 6(4):29-34. [ Google Scholar]
  32. Hajiaghamohammadi AA, Zargar A, Oveisi S, Samimi R, Reisian S. To evaluate of the effect of adding licorice to the standard treatment regimen of Helicobacter pylori. Braz J Infect Dis 2016; 20(6):534-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2016.07.015 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  33. Momeni A, Rahimian G, Kiasi A, Amiri M, Kheiri S. Effect of licorice versus bismuth on eradication of Helicobacter pylori in patients with peptic ulcer disease. Pharmacognosy Res 2014; 6(4):341-4. doi: 10.4103/0974-8490.138289 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  34. Park JM, Park SH, Hong KS, Han YM, Jang SH, Kim EH. Special licorice extracts containing lowered glycyrrhizin and enhanced licochalcone A prevented Helicobacter pylori-initiated, salt diet-promoted gastric tumorigenesis. Helicobacter 2014; 19(3):221-36. doi: 10.1111/hel.12121 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]