Abstract
Introduction: This study was conducted to compare the clinical success and restoration survival of a resin-based pulp capping material (Apacal ART) with a conventional chemical-cure calcium hydroxide liner (Dycal) in deep carious teeth over a 12-month period.
Methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 120 permanent posterior teeth with deep caries requiring direct pulp capping. Teeth with positive cold test responses and controllable pulpal bleeding were randomly assigned to two groups: Group I (Dycal) and Group II (Apacal ART). Following pulp capping, a glass ionomer liner and composite restoration were placed. Postoperative evaluations were performed at 24 hours, 48 hours, and 12 months. Data were analyzed using the Chi-square test and Kaplan–Meier survival analysis.
Results: Post-operative sensitivity at 48 hours was reported by 17 patients in the Dycal group and 9 patients in the Apacal ART group, with no statistically significant difference between the groups (P=0.06). After 12 months, 4 teeth in the Apacal ART group and 5 teeth in the Dycal group met the criteria for failure outcomes. The Apacal ART group demonstrated superior restoration survival, with a statistically significant difference between groups (P=0.009).
Conclusion: Both Dycal and Apacal ART showed satisfactory clinical performance as direct pulp capping materials. However, Apacal ART exhibited higher restoration survival over 12 months, likely due to its resin-modified composition that enhances bonding, mechanical strength, and marginal adaptation. Resin-based materials such as Apacal ART appear to be promising alternatives for direct pulp capping procedures.