Logo-ajdr

Submitted: 06 Mar 2025
Revision: 25 Jun 2025
Accepted: 12 Jul 2025
ePublished: 30 Dec 2025
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)

Avicenna J Dent Res. 2025;17(4): 235-240.
doi: 10.34172/ajdr.2290
  Abstract View: 156
  PDF Download: 23

Original Article

Seating Accuracy of Printed Artificial Teeth in Complete Prostheses at Different Print Angles

Fariborz Vafaee 1 ORCID logo, Zahra Bagheri 1* ORCID logo, Elnaz Rostami Jalilian 2, Sevda Movaffagh 1, Maryam Farhadian 3

1 Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
2 Dentist, Private practice
3 Modeling of Noncommunicable Diseases Research Center, Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Zahra Bagheri, Email: Zbagheriii@yahoo.com

Abstract

Background: 3D printers are widely utilized in dentistry for complete prostheses due to fast production, high accuracy, and personal customization.Although these printers have had a significant effect on improving the treatment and manufacturing of tools and prostheses, the techniques used in printing 3D models are still unable to provide ideal quality in all applications, and many variables can affect the accuracy of 3D printing models. The purpose of this study was to compare the difference in the seating accuracy of printed artificial teeth in the resin base cavities of complete prostheses at different print angles with the aim of reducing the created errors.

Methods: First, a scan was prepared from the cast of a patient. Then, the teeth and prosthetic base were designed for a single toothless area, and a total of 60 artificial teeth and bases were printed separately at three angles of 0°, 45°, and 90°. The correct seating of these teeth in the base cavities was evaluated by re-scanning and checking in the software (Dental cad, exocad, GMBH, version 3).

Results: In the palatal region, the midpoint-to-midpoint (M.M.) and vertical measurement at a 45° angle had the most accuracy, while in the cylinder-to-cylinder (C.C.) measurement, the highest accuracy was observed at a 0° angle (P<0.001). In the buccal area, the M.M. measurement demonstrated the highest accuracy at a 90° angle, the C.C. measurement at a 0° angle, and the vertical measurement at a 45° angle (P<0.001).

Conclusion: Based on the findings, there was a significant difference with the gold standard for all printing angles in various measurements of the accuracy of tooth seating in the printed resin base.



Please cite this article as follows: Vafaee F, Bagheri Z, Rostami Jalilian E, Movaffagh S, Farhadian M. Seating accuracy of printed artificial teeth in complete prostheses at different print angles. Avicenna J Dent Res. 2025;17(4):235-240. doi:10.34172/ajdr.2290
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 62

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

PDF Download: 23

Your browser does not support the canvas element.