Logo-ajdr
Submitted: 14 Apr 2018
Accepted: 20 Aug 2018
ePublished: 12 Sep 2018
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)

Avicenna J Dent Res. 2018;10(3): 107-113.
doi: 10.34172/ajdr.2018.22
  Abstract View: 1085
  PDF Download: 831

Research Article

Evaluation of Microshear Bond Strength of Light and Chemically-Cured Composite Resins to Light-Cured Glass-Ionomer Using Various Bonding Systems

Shahin Kasraie 1 ORCID logo, Bahareh Asgartooran 2, Mohadese Shokripour 2* ORCID logo

1 Professor of Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental School, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
*Corresponding Author: Email: shokripour557@gmail.com

Abstract

Background: This study was conducted to compare the microshear bond strength (MSBS) of chemically-cured and light cured composite to resin-modified glass-ionomer (RMGI) based on different types of adhesive systems.

Methods: Thirty-two discs of Vitrebond RMGI were prepared and randomly divided into 8 groups. Four cylinders of composite resin were placed on each RMGI sample. Z250 composite was bonded to the RMGI discs with Single-Bond, Clearfil SE-Bond, and Clearfil S3-Bond adhesive agent in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Group 4 was considered to be the control group without any adhesive. In groups 5-8, the procedures were the same as those in groups 1-4, except that a chemically-cured composite (Master Dent) was used. All the samples were kept at 37˚C for 24 hours and tested for MSBS by a mechanical testing machine at a strain rate of 0.5 mm/min. Failure mode was assessed under a stereomicroscope. Data analysis was carried out by two-way ANOVA, independent t test, one-way ANOVA and Tukey honestly significant difference test.

Results: Application of a bonding agent significantly increased MSBS (P=0.0001). MSBS was significantly higher in samples with light cured composite resin compared to the chemically-cured composite (P=0.0001).

Conclusions: Application of an adhesive system significantly increased the MSBS of composite resins to RMGI. The bond strength of composite resin to RMGI could vary depending on the type of the composite resin and the adhesive system.


Citation: Kasraei S, Asgartooran B, Shokripour M. Evaluation of microshear bond strength of light and chemically-cured composite resins to light-cured glass-ionomer using various bonding systems. Avicenna J Dent Res. 2018;10(3):107-113. doi: 10.15171/ajdr.2018.22.
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 1086

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 831

Your browser does not support the canvas element.