Logo-ajdr
ePublished: 30 Dec 2010
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)

Avicenna J Dent Res. 2010;2(1): 74-81.
  Abstract View: 1361
  PDF Download: 628

Original Article

Comparison of dental intraoral films by means of radiographic characteristics

K. Ghazikhanlou Sani 1*, A. Eskandarlou 2, E. Tahmasebi 3, P. Akbari 3

1 Medical Physics, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Paramedical, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
3 Dental Student, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Correspondening Author: Karim Ghazikhanlou Sani, Address: Department of Radiology, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran Telephone: +98-811-8282801, Fax: +98-811-8281442, Email: ghazi@umsha.ac.ir

Abstract

Statement of the problems: Nowadays in many of the dental radiography centers in Iran, three types of intraoral films are being used. There is a controversy about the best film regarding to sensitivity properties.

Purpose: In this study, we aimed to compare sensitivity characteristics and detail recording of intraoral films. 

Methods and materials: In this experimental study, three types of intraoral dental films (Agfa E&F-speed Dentus M2 Comfort, Kodak Intraoral E-speed and Foma Dentix Intraoral E-speed) were evaluated by drawing the characteristic curves of these three types of films. Sensitivity characteristics of each film were defined considering their characteristic curves. To measure the accuracy of the films in recording details an aluminum test object was used.  Finally, the sensitivity characteristics of the films and their ability in detail recording in different processing conditions were compared. Data were analyzed using the ANOVA test. 

Results: The findings indicate that Foma-dentix film presents the highest base plus fogy density using both fresh and used developer solutions. The relative speed of Kodak film was higher than the others. Kodak and Foma-dentix films had the highest and the lowest contrast, respectively. Considering the rate of detail recording, it was found that the detail recording of Agfa film was much better than the two other films in different developing and exposure conditions .The One-way ANOVA test showed significant statistical difference. 

Conclusion: The sensitivity characteristics of Kodak films are better than the other ones. The accuracy of detail resolution of Agfa film was the highest. To achieve a high quality film, it is advised to use a new developer solution.

First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 1362

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 628

Your browser does not support the canvas element.