Logo-ajdr
Revision: 07 May 2015
ePublished: 17 Sep 2016
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)

Avicenna J Dent Res. 2016;8(4): 5.
doi: 10.17795/ajdr-29026
  Abstract View: 1601
  PDF Download: 787

Research Article

Comparison of Whole Salivary Lactate Dehydrogenase Level in Patients With and Without Periodontal Disease

Janet Moradi Haghgoo 1, Sara Soheilifar 1, Mohsen Bidgoli 1, Neda Rastegarfard 1*, Maral Saremi 2, Samare Kafilzade 1

1 Department of Periodontology, Dental Faculty, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, IR Iran
2 Dental Faculty, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, IR Iran
*Corresponding Author: * Corresponding author: Neda Rastegarfard, Department of Periodontics, Dental Faculty, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, IR Iran. Tel: +98-8138381085, Fax: +98-8138381085, E-mail: , Email: neda_rastegarfard@yahoo.com

Abstract

Background: Tracking various biomarkers in serum, gingival crevicular fluid (GCF), and saliva has been introduced as a diagnostic tool for periodontal disease detection.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare salivary lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels in subjects with periodontal disease and levels in subjects without periodontal disease.

Materials and Methods: In this case-control study, 170 patients at Hamadan faculty of Dentistry, including patients with periodontal disease and patients with normal periodontium, were selected and divided into test and control groups. Unstimulated saliva was collected in the same situation from the test and control groups. Each saliva sample was analyzed to measure salivary LDH level on the day of collection, by using commercially available kits according to the manufacturers’ instructions. A statistical T-test was employed to evaluate significant differences among groups.

Results: The mean LDH levels in the test and control groups were 1071.67 ± 731.004 and 550.91 ± 217.215, respectively. As the level of statistical significance was set at P < 0.05, data analysis showed a significant difference between the LDH enzymatic level in the test and control groups (P = 0.000). Comparison of the LDH enzymatic level in subjects with different genders in the test and control groups showed no significant differences (P = 0.340).

Conclusions: Salivary LDH levels can be used as marker of periodontal disease for screening periodontitis in large populations. 

First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 1602

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 787

Your browser does not support the canvas element.