Logo-ajdr
Submitted: 07 Feb 2015
Revision: 22 Mar 2015
Accepted: 06 May 2015
ePublished: 03 Feb 2016
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)

Avicenna J Dent Res. 2016;8(1): 5.
doi: 10.17795/ajdr-27208
  Abstract View: 1132
  PDF Download: 538

Research Article

A Comparison of the Amounts of Artifacts Produced by Five Cements in Cone-Beam CT

Mahkameh Moshfegh 1, Shadi Hamidiaval 2*, Mohsen Pakghalb 3, Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban 4

1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Dental Faculty, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
2 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Dental Faculty, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, IR Iran
3 Faculty of Technical and Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, IR Iran
4 Department of Basic Sciences, School of Rehabilitation, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
*Corresponding Author: * Corresponding author: Shadi Hamidiaval, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Dental Faculty, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, IR Iran. Tel: +98-2188077784, Fax: +98-2122371485, E-mail: , Email: shadi_h65@yahoo.com

Abstract

Background: Bidimensional radiographic methods, including periapical, occlusal, panoramic, and cephalometric radiographs, are widely used in dentistry. However, the superimposition of adjacent structures and consequent loss of anatomic details may occur.

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the artifacts produced by different cements with different densities using conebeam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods: Samples of five cements with different densities including glass ionomers (or GI, from ChemFil Rock and Fuji IX), mineral trioxide aggregates (MTA), zinc oxide eugenol (ZOE), TempBond and a control sample (polyester) were scanned by CBCT device and analyzed using OnDemand 3D application software. The amount of artifacts was measured by ∆ gray scale value (∆GSV), which was achieved by subtracting the gray level of the samples from the control group.

Results: According to the mean GSV of the five different materials, the majority of artifacts produced were as follows: TempBond > ZOE > MTA > GI (ChemFil Dentsply) > GI (GC, FujiIX).

Conclusions: The type of materials can influence the obtained GSV. Different materials cause various amounts of artifacts due to differences in density and atomic number.

First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 1133

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 538

Your browser does not support the canvas element.