﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Hamadan University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Avicenna Journal of Dental Research</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2423-7582</Issn>
      <Volume>1</Volume>
      <Issue>1</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2009</Year>
        <Month>06</Month>
        <DAY>30</DAY>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Knowledge of Dentists about Halitosis in Tehran(2004)</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage>29</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>36</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Z.</FirstName>
        <LastName>Maleki</LastName>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>K.</FirstName>
        <LastName>Alavi</LastName>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>S.Haji</FirstName>
        <LastName>Mohammadi</LastName>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">
      </ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <History>
    </History>
    <Abstract> Statement of the problem: Halitosis is a common condition. Many oral diseases, as well as several systemic diseases, may cause halitosis. According to some studies the prevalence of this symptom is more than 50%. Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the knowledge of general practitioners (dentists), who work in Tehran, about "halitosis". Material &amp; Methods: In this cross-sectional, descriptive study 379 dentists were evaluated. The questionnaire consisted of 15 multiple choice questions (5 choices with one of them being an "I don’t know"). There were 5 questions for evaluating knowledge about etiology of halitosis, 4 questions about pathogenesis, 4 questions on diagnosis and differential diagnosis, and 2 questions for treatment. Criterion scores (of 15) calculated as sum of correct answers and ¼ for an "I don’t know" answer. Spearman- Brown’s reliability index was 0.8. Chi-square and Lawshe’s ω test were used for statistical analysis. Results: Mean (±standard deviation) of criterion scores was 8.06±2.15 out of 15 (median of 8; range of 2.75 to 13). The mean of correct and wrong answers were 7.3±2.3 (median of 7) and 4.7±2.4 (median of 5), respectively. According to extreme groups’ scores all items were appropriately distinctive. Difficulty degree varied from 8.2% to 86.5%. Conclusion: The level of general practitioners’ knowledge was relatively low. Only about half of study population could achieve a criterion score more than 7.5 out of 15. </Abstract>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Dentist</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Halitosis</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Oral Disease</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>