Logo-ajdr
Submitted: 17 Aug 2012
Accepted: 20 Nov 2012
ePublished: 31 Dec 2012
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)

Avicenna J Dent Res. 2012;4(2): 120-126.
  Abstract View: 1088
  PDF Download: 512

Original Article

Microleakage of Class V Compomer and Light-cured Glass-ionomer Restorations under Load Cycling: An in Vitro Investigation

Z Khamverdi 1, Y Sadeghi 2, T Omidipoor 2, F Nasr 2, Sh Kasraei 3*

1 Associate Professor, Dental Research Center, Department of Operative Dentistry, Dental Faculty, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
2 Post-graduate Student, Department of Operative Dentistry, Dental Faculty, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Dental Research Center, Department of Operative Dentistry, Dental Faculty, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
*Corresponding Author: Corresponding Author: Sh. Kasraei Address: Associate Professor, Dental Research Center, Dept. of Operative Dentistry, Dental Faculty, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran. Tel: +989123481767 , Email: shahin.kasraei@gmail.com

Abstract

Statement of the problem: Tooth restorations are exposed to stresses which produce marginal gaps resulting in microleakage. 

Purpose: In this study, microleakage of light-cured glass-ionomer and compomer class V restorations  was evaluted and compared under cyclic loading. 

 Materials and Methods: In this exprimental study, class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surfaces of maxillary premolars (n=40). The teeth were randomly divided into two equal groups. Samples in one group were restored with Compoglass and those in the other group were restored with Fuji II LC. All the samples were thermocycled for 2500 cycles. Each group was subjected to cyclic loading (10000 cycles). Dye peneteration method was used for samples. Finally, microleakage of the restorations was evaluated under a stereomicroscope at ×20. Data were analyzed with chi-squared test. The confidance level was set at 95% (α=5%).

Results: Microleakage was observed at 55% of restoration margins with both materials, with more leakage in the Compoglass group. The results showed no statically significant differences between the two groups (P>0.05). In addition, no significant differences were seen in microleakage between gingival and occlusal margins (P=0.64 and P=0.7, respectively).

Conclusion:  Microleakage of Compoglass and Fuji II LC restorations was not different at margins under cyclic loading. 

First Name
 
Last Name
 
Email Address
 
Comments
 
Security code


Abstract View: 1089

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 512

Your browser does not support the canvas element.