Logo-ajdr
Submitted: 10 Mar 2024
Revision: 16 Nov 2024
Accepted: 20 Nov 2024
ePublished: 30 Dec 2024
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)

Avicenna J Dent Res. 2024;16(4): 218-224.
doi: 10.34172/ajdr.1795
  Abstract View: 39
  PDF Download: 25

Original Article

Comparison of the Efficacy of Gluma, Colgate Sensitive Pro-Relief Toothpaste, and 980 nm Diode Laser on Dentinal Tubule Occlusion: An in Vitro Study

Mahshad Noori Barkestani 1 ORCID logo, Arash Azizi 2, Pantea Amiri 3, Shirin Lawaf 4* ORCID logo

1 Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
2 Oral Medicine Department,School of Dentistry.Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 General Dentist, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
4 Prosthodontics Department,School of Dentistry .Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Shirin Lawaf, Email: drshlawaf1@gmail.com

Abstract

Background: Dentin hypersensitivity is a common issue among dental patients. There exist different treatments, including gels, solutions, toothpastes, and lasers. This study compared the effectiveness of Gluma, Colgate Sensitive Pro-Relief toothpaste, and 980 nm diode laser on dentinal tubule occlusion.

Methods: In this experimental study, 40 premolar teeth without caries, fractures, restorations, or root canal treatments were chosen for analysis. The enamel of the samples was removed using a bur, and then the samples were prepared and divided into four groups. Three treatments were applied to three groups of teeth, and the fourth group was considered the control group. The number of occluded, semi-occluded, and open dentinal tubules in the samples was calculated using field emission scanning electron microscopy, and the results were reported as percentages. Statistical analyses were then performed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Tamhane tests.

Results: The results showed that the number of occluded dentinal tubules was 90.3%±8.23, 74.4%±11.62, 67.60%±10.62, and 15.03%±3.39 in the laser, Gluma, toothpaste, and control groups, respectively. The differences between the three treatment groups and the control group were significant (P<0.05). All three different treatments significantly occluded dentinal tubules.

Conclusions: Based on the findings, the 940 nm laser could effectively reduce dentin sensitivity.



Please cite this article as follows: Noori Barkestani M, Azizi A, Amiri P, Lawaf S. Comparison of the efficacy of Gluma, Colgate sensitive pro-relief toothpaste, and 980 nm diode laser on dentinal tubule occlusion: an in vitro study. Avicenna J Dent Res. 2024; 16(4):218-224. doi:10.34172/ajdr.1795
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 40

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 25

Your browser does not support the canvas element.