Submitted: 16 Jan 2018
Accepted: 05 Mar 2018
First published online: 28 Mar 2018
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - FireFox Plugin)

Avicenna J Dent Res. 2018;10(1):22-27.
doi: 10.15171/ajdr.2018.05
  Abstract View: 86
  PDF Download: 81

Research Article

Demographic Evaluation of Implant Locations Among 1000 Adult Patients in Turkey

Guler Yildirim 1, Cagatay Aktas 2, Nilufer Tulin Polat 3, Esma Basak Gul Aygun 4

1 Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.
2 Prosthodontist, Ankara, Turkey.

Article

Background: The present study aimed to evaluate the demographics of the patients who applied for implant treatment to Inonu University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics between 2010 and 2016.

Methods: In implant patients, implant locations, type of restoration after implant treatment, age and gender of the patients were determined using Metasoft software. FDI numbering system was used for implant locations. Descriptive statistics were analyzed using chi-square test (P<0.05).

Results: It was found that a total of 1000 patients (410 males, 590 females) received 2955 implants during the specified period. 1052 implants were received by individuals between the ages of 41 and 50. There were statistical differences between age groups based on the implants in tooth numbers 14, 27, 34, 36, 37, 44, 46, and 47 (P<0.05) that were frequently implemented in 41-50 year old patients. It was found that the most frequent restoration type was single crowns and the first molar tooth received the highest number of implants. It was found that the regions that received the highest number of implants were the mandible and posterior regions.

Conclusions: It was determined that the number of implants in the mandible increased with the age of the patients. It was observed that the implant-supported prosthetic treatment options varied based on the state of the jaws, the localization and width of the edentation, the income levels of the patients and their gender.

 Citation: Yildirim G, Aktas C, Polat NT, Gul Aygun EB. Demographic evaluation of implant locations among 1000 adult patients in Turkey. Avicenna J Dent Res. 2018;10(1):22-27. doi: 10.15171/ajdr.2018.05.
First name
 
Last name
 
Email address
 
Comments
 
Security code


Article Viewed: 86

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Downloaded: 81

Your browser does not support the canvas element.